Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Lara


Lara, I learned of your death yesterday.  I was stunned, then sad, then sick.   I felt ashamed – I hadn’t seen you for over ten years – what right did I have to grieve?

Lara, I remember sitting with you on the floor of your bedroom.  Bright colors, your shoulder-length brown hair framing an unusual harlequin face.  That face, your mother told me, arrested people in the street.  They had seen cute children, lovely children, adorable, pretty, precious children.  But Lara, you were beautiful, in the way children aren’t supposed to be beautiful.

Lara, your unsettling beauty did not make you any less of a child, a normal child.  You liked dinosaurs.  At your mother’s instruction, I spoke English while you played.  You did not understand a word I said, but you understood everything.  I felt silly and ridiculous, but you – you growled and handed me a little plastic dinosaur and showed me that you didn’t care.  I thanked you silently for accepting me. 

Lara, the worst thing about all of this is the inscription in your father’s book.  I caught but a brief glimpse of your father, a philosopher, an academician, a serious man in serious clothes.  He waited sixty-three years for your arrival.  You were born on the day he published his treatise, and he dedicated it to you, expressing his hope that you and the book, born simultaneously, would meet by chance someday. 
Lara, I am furious at the thought that this day will never come, because time stopped when you were seven years old.   

Lara, I am sorry that the world couldn’t do enough to keep you here.  I am sorry that the stars did not align, that the push did not pull, that the up was not down, that the north was not south, that the right was not left, that the east was not west, that the silent was not spoken, that the dark was not bright, that the heavy was not light, that the way your light was extinguished was so unworthy, I am so, so sorry, Lara.

Sunday, February 15, 2015

Rediscovery: Children's Books

A strange thing has happened to me since I gave birth to my first child (really, one of many strange things). I have become interested in children's books.

It's not that I didn't read books when I was a child. Rather, as a child, I did not pause to think I was reading children's books. To me, they were just books. I didn't care what made a book suitable for children, or who decided that it was so. I didn't question why an adult author would choose to write books for children rather than other adults. At most, if I ever wondered about what differentiated my books from those that my mother read, I assumed it was the utter lack of colorful illustrations in the latter.

As I grew older, my typical-teenager arrogance led me to believe that only those who lacked the skill to write adult novels wrote children's books. "A serious writer doesn't write children's books," my teenage self would have insisted. "I could write a children's book. It's so easy." [NB: The irony of this proclamation will not be lost on those who read my previous post re: Jackson Pollock.]

Fast-forward a couple decades, and I am a new mother, with all of the accompanying neuroses, including worrying about my child's brain development. At ten months old, is she as smart as she should be? Am I doing everything I should be to stimulate her intellectual curiosity? 


I have been reading to my daughter since the day I brought her home from the hospital. My own mother laughed at me as I read aloud Alexander Liberman's The Artist in His Studio in a crescendoing voice, pretending I could drown out my newborn's screams, partly in a quest to introduce reading into our daily routine; mostly in a quest to remind myself that before I brought this baby home, I was interested in things other than anti-gas bottles and click-connect stroller/carseat systems.

As my newborn grew, so did the time she spent sleeping at night, and I was finally able to read The Artist in His Studio on my own time. I made space on my bookshelves for my daughter's own book collection, and set out to fill it with the books I enjoyed reading when I was a child. The first book that came to mind was Shel Silverstein's The Giving Tree. I remembered loving this simple story with its poignant message of selflessness. I also remembered hating that little boy for the way he treated the tree! I ordered the book as much for my daughter's collection as for my own sake. When I re-read the book, I cried. I cried because the story elicited much the same emotions as I had experienced when I read the book as a child. Yet, somehow, reading it as an adult brought to light the author's craft - his unique ability to weave the subtleties of morality into a seemingly uncomplicated, linear story, written in language easily grasped by children. I was moved by the timelessness of Silverstein's message.

Re-discovering Shel Silverstein was amazing, and now I want to show all the books I enjoyed reading when I was a child to my adult eyes, and, ultimately, to my daughter. One of my unanticipated pleasures in having a child is the ability to re-live the best parts of my childhood, such as discovering books. I cannot wait to see her reactions to the stories I know and love, and to those we discover for the first time together. I cannot wait to hear the questions she asks. As we approach the end of a book, I will ask her how she would like the story to end. I will ask her which of her books I should keep on my nightstand, that designated custodian of literature worth frequent re-reading. I express an immeasurable gratitude to all those men and women who have the singular skill and the courage to write for children the lessons that adults take a lifetime to learn.  


C. S. Lewis amplified the Biblical passage "When I became a man I put away childish things" with "...including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." Indeed, in my joyous re-discovery of children's literature, I have overcome my teenage fear of seeming juvenile and unsophisticated.  What children's book do you find unforgettable?

Wednesday, February 11, 2015

Jackson Pollock, my hero.

A Jackson Pollock painting displayed in my home constantly draws criticism from visitors.  From the quizzical "What's that supposed to be?" to the transparently derisive, "Paint splatter, eh?" it seems I am always called upon to defend my selection of this painting, my taste in art, or perhaps even Jackson Pollock's entire body of work.  I am not, by any means, a Pollock scholar, so I am not going to expound on the virtues of his work as they are perceived in the artistic community.  I don't really like "accepted points of view" or industry consensus anyway.  In matters of taste, I say to each his own.

Why are people so resistant - or downright hostile - to unfamiliar forms of creative expression, and particularly, to non-representational art? French writer/artist/filmmaker Jean Cocteau thought the answer was "the public wants to understand first and to feel afterwards."  What is it that we need to understand about Jackson Pollock before we permit his work to elicit an emotional response from us? Or is it that our minds need to understand something about the work itself - such as what motivated its creation - before we allow our hearts to feel a certain way about it? I am not a fan of over-intellectualizing art, because I do think that sometimes people begin to create art without an agenda, and it is in the course of the creative process that the artist discovers his purpose and his work's meaning. I dare not say I understand Jackson Pollock's work, but I certainly feel something when I look at it. I feel the artist's, and all of mankind's, heroism.

I was first introduced to the concept of man as a heroic being in the books of objectivist philosopher and novelist Ayn Rand, and "heroic" is precisely what I think of when I look at Jackson Pollock's paintings. I picture a madman, thrashing about, paint brushes in hand, battling that which only he can see. And for that he is a hero. I envision him splattering that paint at the critics who said he wouldn't, couldn't, shouldn't. And for that he is a hero. I feel him painting over his inner turmoil.  And for that he is a hero.  I sense him violently stomping out the nagging urge to just give up and damn it all to hell. And for that he is a hero. I feel him using pattern and color to trap the rage and desperation, and the occasional elation. And for that he is a hero. Sometimes, though, I just feel his exhaustion.  

"Art - any art by which you may become famous - is a tiresome and laborious affair," wrote Ford Madox Ford; "if it were not, famous painters, musicians and writers would grow on every blackberry bush. They do not." I cringe whenever I hear people say things like, "my kid could draw this" and "how come I don't get paid millions to do this?"  Well, your kid could...and so could you...but will you? Will you make "paint splatter" your life's work, be consumed by your passion for it to the exclusion of most other life activities? Will you continue doing it for decades before it earns you a penny? Are you willing to drown out the cackle of critics who mock your art, to become alienated from your family and friends, to witness wannabe artists collect accolades while your work collects dust? If you can answer yes to all of these questions, or, better still, if you have done all of these things, then by all means - criticize Jackson Pollock, and sneer at my choice of wall decor.

Friday, February 6, 2015

On the eve of a birthday...

Tomorrow, a dear friend’s daughter turns one. The sparkly pink birthday card I purchased for her reads, “wishing an enchanting little princess the happiest birthday in all the land!” Sure, the message is canned and silly, but then again, what does one say to a one year old?
This birthday card, much like all American greeting cards, seems to have been made so as to discourage personalization. The glossy, slippery surface of the paper the card is printed on is antithetical to ink. The pre-printed text is right smack dab in the middle of the card, preemptively interrupting any message I may wish to write by cutting into its middle and proclaiming its presumed superiority in glitter-encrusted capital letters. Is it a wonder, then, that more than half of the cards people send me don’t even contain my name, much less a personal message?

Which brings me to my next question: does anyone care anymore about handwritten, personalized greeting cards? Why am I penning multiple drafts of a card to a one-year-old, who cannot read it anyway? I’m not out to curry favor with her parents; they like me already. I don’t think I am uniquely equipped with wise or moving words that no one else may say to this child. On the contrary, the words spoken by her parents and grandparents are certain to be imbued with more love, tenderness and meaning. So, then, do I surrender and let Hallmark do its job, rather than trying to reinvent the wheel?

Of course not. This is me, after all: willing to risk looking, sounding and writing like a fool, as long as in doing so, I am being true to myself. So I continue to pore over the right words to express my heartfelt wishes for a one-year-old girl, until I distill my message to the following:

My wishes for you, sweet girl, probably echo those of your own Mama. I say that with confidence, because my wishes for my own daughter are identical. I wish for you to grow up…but to remain just as you are now: without judgment, bias, self-consciousness, and ulterior motives. I wish for you to accessorize every outfit you ever wear with your radiant smile. I wish for you to be able to reach your arms out for a hug whenever you feel like you need one, without any concern of appearing vulnerable or needy. I wish for you to be able to dedicate yourself to any task with complete abandon, undivided attention and ardent passion, no matter how trifling or unworthy it may seem to others. I wish for you to always have complete trust in your parents, in their goodness and infallibility, the way you presently do. I wish for you to remain mesmerized by nature, the way you are now. I wish for you to always be as unapologetically assertive as you are whenever you are hungry or tired. And long after you have learned all the rules of logic and reason, I wish for you to believe in magic, in the possibility of the impossible, the certainty of the uncertain, and in the permanence of the wonder and enchantment that colors your current world. And as I will ask in every card and letter I ever write to you, be a good and loyal friend to my daughter!

_________________________  

Thursday, February 5, 2015

On Regret

Many people regret having missed an opportunity or let a loving relationship slip through their fingers.  I regret the sudden and irrational destruction of the journals I kept between the ages of nine and twenty-three.  

There were over thirty notebooks of all kinds, ranging from marbled composition books I’d purchased at the 99 Cent Store to luxurious, embossed leather journals I’d received as gifts, and they contained thousands of handwritten pages, chronicling everything from letters to an imaginary childhood friend, to the awe and trepidation I experienced upon graduating from college and moving to New York City.  These journals contained a coming-of-age story that could only be told by one person, in only one way, and they were perfect, because they were perfectly ME.  Why, then, did I unceremoniously dump them into a garbage bin one day? 

I wish I had some cogent, relatable answer.  The truth is despicably banal: in a manic fit of cleaning most likely induced by the reading of a self-help book  - and I am not, by any means, a neat freak – I decided that getting rid of my old journals would solve all of my problems.  Never mind the piles of clothes and knick-knacks all over the place; I chose to throw out nearly fifteen years’ worth of original written material, a capsule of my youth, in order to make room for – what? More cheap jeans? 

Perhaps that box of journals met its unfortunate end because it presented itself as one large item I could grab and quickly get rid of; unlike the ubiquitous piles of clothing that required sorting and a few trips to the Salvation Army, it was something I could easily tackle.  The sick thing is, the horror and senselessness of what I had done didn’t hit me until months later, long after the two square feet of closet space I had freed up had been stuffed with ill-fitting McFashion.  To say I wanted to kick myself would be an understatement.  I felt like I had a hole in my heart.  My one priceless, irreplaceable possession, and I had chucked it like a greasy sandwich wrapper, without a second thought.  As more time passed, my regret was amplified by the fact that no one with whom I shared my story was able to offer any words of comfort.  Instead, they all agreed that what I’d done was idiotic. 


I wish I could end this on a positive note of redemption, but the truth is, I’m still very upset and I deeply regret having discarded those journals.  After my beloved grandmother died last year, I was plagued with thoughts of how many of her stories, jokes and bits of wisdom I had recorded in those journals and how desperately I wished I were able to re-read them.  Whether or not the journals actually do contain these sentimental family memories, I cannot now recall.  But because I no longer have them, they necessarily contain everything precious and fleeting about my youth, and they are irretrievably lost.  Left in their place is a messy closet and a heart heavy with regret.

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

The Teddy Roosevelt commuter: I want to be her.

My New York City subway commute is usually punctuated by a soundtrack of complaints.  A pair of NYU undergrads whine about how early their film class starts ("Like, who in the industry even gets up that early?").  Three teenagers with Fjallraven Kanken rucksacks slung over their shoulders bemoan the fact that the history teacher asked about stuff on the last quiz that she definitely had never mentioned in class.  The disgruntled construction workers in paint-stained Levis chuckle over stories of how much they hate their boss.  And then there's the token Louis Vuitton-bag toting blonde, with beach wave hair that probably took hours to style, kvetching to her latte-sipping girlfriend about how f-n cold it is and how this winter just.needs.to.end.  I've grown so accustomed to this background buzz that I no longer need headphones to tune it out.    The moment the train car opens, I enter my zen.  I see, but I do not hear: I submerge into my book and manage to get in twenty precious minutes of reading.  

Until one day, she appeared.  My ears must have picked up on the contrast set by positive tone of her conversation, compared to that of the miserable souls surrounding her.  She was talking to her friends about Teddy Roosevelt and his father, reciting with genuine enthusiasm quotes attributable to the two men, and sharing all sorts of interesting historical tidbits.  She kept up this monologue for the duration of my twenty-minute ride on the train.  It didn't matter whether what she was saying was historically accurate.  I was impressed that this woman wasn't complaining about the doldrums of her daily life, like the typical commuter (and I do not exclude myself from this category).  I don't know whether she purposely set out to talk about something that would be new and interesting to her friends.  I'd like to think she read the same quote I recently did, and chose to implement its wisdom:

Average minds discuss people; smart minds discuss events; exceptional minds discuss ideas.


I wish I were more like this woman.  Too often, I easily succumb to complaining, or, worse yet, gossiping.  How much more productive and accomplished could I be if I didn't begin my morning begrudging the fact that it's a rainy/snowy/Monday morning.  How much more intriguing and engaging would I be if I could have an intelligent conversation with my friends that did not involve citing TMZ or People.com.  In a perfect world...

Given my recent quest to not let myself be paralyzed by perfection, I will acknowledge that complaint and gossip have their purpose in life.  Though they are not enough to nurture and sustain friendships, they are surprisingly good starting blocks from which to build relationships.  So having given them the bit of credit they are due, I will make a conscious effort to minimize my own complaining and be like the Teddy Roosevelt lady, a woman with fascinating conversation.

Monday, January 26, 2015

The real Hans Stern

In 1939, a seventeen-year-old Jewish boy arrived in Rio de Janeiro, fleeing the onset of war in his native Germany. He got a job as a typing clerk at Cristab, a company that cut, polished and exported precious Brazilian gemstones. In the course of his work at Cristab, Hans traveled to the state of Minas Gerais to meet with local miners, and it was there that the beauty of tourmalines (a Paraiba tourmaline is 10,000 times as rare as a diamond!), aquamarines, amethysts and other stones native to Brazil caught his eye. Six years later, young Hans sold his accordion for two hundred dollars, and invested the money in marketing and selling Brazilian gems, which, until then, the international market didn't really know or care about. The first H.Stern store opened in Rio in 1945, and due to Hans' innovative marketing strategies - giving tours of his workshop, backing his products with warranties, inventing and patenting the 18k "noble gold", and collaborating with celebrities like Catherine Deneuve - eventually grew into the multinational luxury brand it is today. H. Stern introduced the first gemological laboratory in Latin America, and the only Latin American jeweler invited to participate in the Exhibition of Modern Jewellery held by London's Victoria & Albert Museum in 1961. Mr. Stern, who didn't cultivate a public persona and hated giving interviews, died in Rio de Janeiro on October 26, 2007 at the age of 85, leaving behind a legacy of 160 stores in 12 countries, and exquisite jewelry such as the sampling you see here: www.facebook.com/borninthewrongdecade


 

My neighborhood jeweler, H. Stern


I was studying abroad in Rio de Janeiro, and every day, on my walk to school, I’d pass a jewelry store with a very stern-looking facade and an equally stern-looking security guard at the door. The store was aptly named H. Stern. It was 2003, I was a small-town girl who came to Rio from southeastern Pennsylvania, and I had no clue about anything. Anything. Least of all, luxury brands.

My first instinct was that H. Stern stood for Howard Stern. That’s the only H.Stern I’d ever heard of. Hey, this neighborhood jeweler must have a sense of humor! He named his store after Howard Stern! But as the weeks went by and I passed that store twice a day, I decided that that couldn’t be it.

I need to gather the courage to get past that stern-looking security guard and enter what had to be the coolest jewelry shop in all of Rio, the place where I’d be able to find a ton of quirky, authentically Brazilian pieces to take home as souvenirs to my mom and my college girl friends.

One day, looking particularly chic in my black statement tank (which, as my Portuguese teacher explained, said something along the lines of “Not even paying attention!”) and my rubber Havaianas flip-flops, I boldly made eye contact with the security guard and yanked open that heavy door like I meant business. I went it, straw beach tote in hand, with plenty of room in it for all of the jewelry I was about to buy.

You know the rest. H.Stern turned out to be far from the artisanal Brazilian jeweler I had envisioned. In order to buy anything in the store, I would’ve had to work four jobs for the next forty years. I walked out mortified. But as with all situations life throws at us, there was a lesson to be learned. A year later, when I moved to New York City, I was savvy enough to know that Louis Vuitton wasn’t the local purse-maker.

"Hard to get," said no one about a book in the past decade.

I listen to an audio book on my walk to the train station. When I board the train, I open a paperback. As I read that book, I think of two more on the same topic that I have been meaning to read. I pull out my cell phone and drop a few volumes into my Amazon shopping basket. During my lunch break, I go to the library and check out a book that I didn't buy on Amazon because it was too expensive. I start reading that book on the train ride home from work. When I get off the train, it's back to the audiobook for the walk home. Approaching my house, I discover a box of books from Amazon sitting on my doorstep. Oh yeah...I completely forgot that I had ordered those, purposely picking the slowest shipping option in hopes that I'd finish what I am currently reading before these new books arrived.

I am a lover of learning and a self-professed bibliophile, and the ease of acquisition of reading material has completely robbed me of focus, quiet contemplation, and thorough, critical study. Computers, cell phones, tablets and digital retailers have made it all to easy to acquire books virtually instantly. The library's collection of audiobooks and ebooks, available for free download at any hour, into the palm of my hand from the comfort of my own bed, has sent my ability to concentrate into a tailspin.

A recent reading of Markus Zusak's "The Book Thief," which tells the story of a little girl who cherished the two or three books she was able to get her hands on in war-torn Germany, left me recalling with nostalgia those grade-school days when I could only sign out one library book at a time. That one book would have my undivided attention. There was no digital bookstore to suggest five other titles that I may be interested in, or casually mention the other books that purchasers of this particular book bought (or did they?). I couldn't buy a book with the ease of a single click and have it instantly appear on my hand-held device. I actually had to go to a bookstore, which made impulse purchases a lot less frequent.

With great shame, I admit that nowadays, I rush through a book just to get to the next one on my reading list. Why? So I can keep up with trends, discuss the book du jour, feel smarter? Do I actually retain any of the knowledge to be gleaned from a book's pages if I rapidly consume it just to move on to the next one? Sadly, the answers to these questions don't describe the person that I would like to be.

Monday, January 12, 2015

Shoe hat

Elsa Schiaparelli (collaboration with Salvador Dalí), winter 1937-38. Black wool felt. The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. Gift of Rose Messing, 1974 (1974.139).

Lobster dress

Designed by Elsa Schiaparelli, in collaboration with Salvador Dalí, in February 1937. 
Printed silk organza, synthetic horsehair
The Philadelphia Museum of Art acquired this dress in 1969, but I believe it is not currently on display.

Cálice

Music and art often give us a unique perspective on history; one that is more compelling than a written textbook account of what transpired. In 1964, in the midst of the brutal censorship of artists and musicians by the Brazilian militarydictatorship, Chico Buarque de Holanda, Gilberto Gil and Milton Nascimento, three of the most important names in Brazilian music, wrote and performed "Cálice," a song seemingly about a "chalice." In reality, the subversive song was a challenge to the censors, cleverly using a play on words. In Brazilian Portuguese, "cálice" is pronounced just like "cale se," which translates into "shut your mouth." The vocals are layered such that while one voice narrates, the other just insists "cálice," or, in effect, shut up. Once they grasped what was happening, the censors cut the microphone and you can hear one of the men yell, "meu som!" ("my sound!")http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZiT_YHvUThw

Pushkin persists

For lovers of the belles-lettres, Pushkin's legacy continues...
http://www.openlettersmonthly.com/tea-with-the-pushkins-in-brussels/

Ahoy, mate!

Sailor dresses are undeniably chic, even for the over-10 crowd! French fashion designer André Courrèges breathed new life into this childhood favorite, seen in this photo. Courrèges' clothing was form-fitting and his hems were ultra-short, making him a daring presence in 1960s fashion. Naturally, the clothing was worn by the "It Girls" of the day, like Grace Coddington, Marisa Berenson, and Catherine Deneuve.

Leonora


What a beautiful, warm photograph of the artists Leonora Carrington and Max Ernst. This image captures a fleeting moment of serenity and contentment in an otherwise tumultuous affair. If you are not familiar with Leonora Carrington's work, you are in for a treat! Do a Google Images search and share your thoughts. For an excellent biography, read Elena Poniatowska's "Leonora."

Alexander Wang joins Balenciaga


The recent departure of Nicolas Ghesquière from the Balenciaga design house, and his "replacement" by Asian-American street-savvy designer Alexander Wang (as if Ghesquière could ever be replaced!), caused some fashion critics to bristle. Would Cristóbal Balenciaga have approved? Señor Balenciaga never masked his aversion for the Chambre Syndicale de la Couture, the bourgeois regulating commission that determines which fashion design houses qualify for the designation of "haute couture" houses. He also frequently challenged the press by submitting his designs for press coverage weeks after the customary deadlines, in order to sabotage would-be copycats. The defiant Balenciaga might have welcomed Alexander Wang with open arms. The New York Times has a good article on Mr. Wang's new post here: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/09/fashion/an-american-in-paris-again-alexander-wang-at-balenciaga.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

Joy

JOY - how do you define it? The British novelist Zadie Smith opines in this article: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2013/jan/10/joy/?pagination=false

São Schlumberger

An excellent Vanity Fair article about the Portuguese millionairess São Schlumberger, patron of the arts and party enthusiast, who lived a lavish life and hosted extravagant parties, and whose funeral was attended by six people. http://www.vanityfair.com/society/features/2010/09/sao-schlumberger-201009